Social Media and Law Enforcement

social media and law enforcement

I stumbled upon an excellent social media and law enforcement blog post via the Social Times called “FBI Uses Social Media to Catch Mobster.” In short the FBI launched an aggressive social media campaign in an attempt to catch well known fugitive James “Whitey” Bulger. Bulger a Boston mobster, one time FBI informant and mass murder had been on the run for almost 2 decades. Just for the record, the campaign to catch Bulger was not limited to just social media, but television as well. Nonetheless I cannot recall the FBI jumping into social media in such a big way, but then again Bulger was a big fish. I found one particular part of the FBI’s social media campaign extremely compelling from a return on investment (ROI) social media perspective, which was their use of YouTube.

The FBI has had a YouTube channel since the early days of YouTube, 01/30/05. Since this time the FBI has uploaded 83 videos and amassed 109,099 upload views (watched videos). The FBI teaser video as part of the Bulger campaign was a 30 second clip that was not extraordinarily fancy or typical of the FBI. In fact, it came off as more of an America’s Most Wanted appeal or a Saturday Night Live spoof. But here are the social media numbers for this video. The Bulger video to date has garnered 88,153 upload views. Subtract this number from the total FBI upload views since 10/05 and this video accounts for approximately 80% of all upload views. More stunning is the Bulger video has only been live for 10 days at the time of this blog post. Was this video responsible for catching Bulger, not directly. But surely law enforcement can see the power of a 30 second video. Why did this work? I think this worked primarily because the video was short, had a woman voice over, and offered a reward of $100,000.

Ironically it was not the social media campaign that resulted in the capture of Bulger, at least not directly. Apparently traditional media picked up on the fact the FBI was running a massive social media campaign and someone in Santa Monica, California saw the news story on TV and quickly provided the FBI with all the details on where they could nab Bulger.

In summary, law enforcement has an untapped resource in the use of YouTube for capturing fugitives. As one can see from the FBI’s Bulger video there is a market for these types of videos. Why isn’t law enforcement putting more of these videos on YouTube? Think of the potential for closing cases and catching wanted criminals with a fairly simple effort. Hopefully law enforcement will take note of the FBI’s success with YouTube and figure out how to use this social media channel to capture more wanted criminals.

Share

{ 0 comments }

Social Media in Prison

Personally, I feel if you are in prison you should lose the right to have access to social media, social networking, and people in general. If you have made it to a prison cell you have been convicted of a crime by a judge or jury, thus limiting your rights. Kind of like being a kid who gets in trouble in kindergarten or grade school and gets a time out. The kids in time out aren’t watching TV, playing video games, talking to other kids or updating their status on their Facebook pages. According to a Police One article an inmate named Justin L. Walker has pictures of him smoking a bong, licking a shiv (homemade prison knife), and holding a bottle of booze (other inmate holding a bag of weed). How is this possible? While these may not be 100% authentic (weed & booze), the flame is as well as the picture of the shiv.

social media and law enforcementsocial media and law enforcement

The above pictures were easy to find through a search on Facebook for this guy. Besides stupidity for 1) taking pictures of potential criminal activities, 2) posting them on Facebook profile or 3) having someone else post on Facebook profile, why does this guy have access to Facebook, a cell phone or camera? Bottom line, this guy killed a Sheriff in Oklahoma and he has numerous other criminal charges and should not have the freedom to do this. Do we want people like this on Facebook? Do you want this guy friending your child, girlfriend, mother? I don’t. The obvious security risks posed by an inmate having access to communicate on a social network are dangerous. While law enforcement has been slow to deal with social media, apparently, the correctional system should be working on plans to prevent inmates from participating in this type of communication. What do you think? MV

social networking

Share

{ 1 comment }

social media and law enforcement

Law enforcement has basically been at the mercy of the news media. Whether issuing press releases, responding to a high profile case, or requesting help from citizens in a missing person case the police were (are) at the behest of the media to communicate there message.

Social media offers alternative options for law enforcement agencies to take control of their communication and messaging. Facebook fan pages, Twitter, blogs, iPhone apps, podcasting, YouTube, are just a few social media channels that allow law enforcement to call the shots on their messaging. There is a shift in control when law enforcement can offensively deploy a press release to Twitter or Facebook for the general public, which includes the press agencies. Press conferences can be pre-determined through simple video podcasting efforts with editing prior to release and posting to agencies websites, blogs, or YouTube for release to the world wide web. Best of all these communications options are very inexpensive.

The premise is law enforcement no longer has to rely on the media for press coverage. They can take control of their messaging and reach a larger audience. One law enforcement agency that has taken the leap by issuing press release through social media sites only is the Boca Raton Police Department. The media responded to the Boca Raton PD by running a mostly negative news spot, but they have now become use to obtaining press releases through Facebook and Twitter.

Social media offers law enforcement alternatives on getting their message out, which will allow them to control investigations better, keep better public relations, and so on. Mike Vallez

Share

{ 7 comments }

The US Department of State has jumped into Facebook amid a growing number of federal agencies that are doing the same. Other federal agencies involved in social media are the National Security Agency, US Army, US Navy, US Coast Guard, The White House, and many others. The federal government is clearly becoming a leader in communicating their message through “social networking” sites. But is the federal government setting the standard on how to be involved in “social media?” How about from a national security perspective? There are not a lot of private national security companies for obvious reasons. However, law enforcement is in the business of national security particularly post 09/11. So why is law enforcement so slow to respond to the obvious?

The obvious is that social networking sites offer law enforcement a new way to communicate to their consumers, constituents, and others. The “others” category is a group of people who transcend the the geographical area of a law enforcement agency and consist of web users, the world wide web. Typically law enforcement only communicated to their local citizens by television, news paper, or radio, which was geographically limiting. The web allows for a much broader audience even an international audience. Additionally, it must be assumed that a certain percentage of a law enforcement agencies local constituents are also involved in social networking sites. But, why would a law enforcement agency care to broadcast information to anyone other than their local citizens?

Because prior to the “blow up” of social networking sites in the last few years the web was primarily a reference tool to gather information and was not used as much for “social” online communication. The change in culture that has occurred is epic and is not a fade. People are consuming news from Facebook, Twitter, Digg, and other websites that were not typical news outlets, but are now. We all can agree that how people are accessing information has changed. A quick stat that supports this, “more than 5 billion pieces of content (web links, news stories, blog posts, notes, photo albums, etc.) shared each week” on Facebook (Facebook Statistics). It is no wonder the federal government is getting on board with social media. By setting up communication channels on social networking sites they are to reaching out to a growing number of people who are gathering information from places like Facebook and Twitter and not from newspapers or television.

Hopefully law enforcement will see the value in getting their message out through social networking sites. Be it a press release, wanted person information, missing person information, crime prevention information and so on. The US government has invested in communication through social networking sites, specifically from a national security perspective maybe law enforcement will take this cue and get involved as well. Just to be fair, not each and every law enforcement agency is oblivious to using social networking sites. There are some using social networking sites to further their communication, however, in general law enforcement has not overwhelmingly jumped into the conversation just yet. Mike Vallez

Share

{ 10 comments }

A recent article from Southern California Public Radio touts a couple of California state law makers that are attempting to pass a law to make it illegal for sex offenders to use social networking sites that children, kids, teens may frequent. I applaud Assemblywoman Norma Torres for getting legs on this topic, but reading this article leaves me wanting more.

Banning “sex offenders” from Facebook, MySpace and other social networking sites seems like common sense. If we are going to pass laws that prohibit a convicted sex offender from coming within X amount of feet from children then why not have the same standards for social networking sites for these scarlet letter criminals? In my opinion it is much easier for a sexual predator to manipulate a child/young adult online from the privacy of their own home, where no one can see their activities. Sexual predators use social networking sites on a regular basis (pedophiles online ) to cultivate leads for offline conversion of their illegal sexual activities. While not all “creeps” on Facebook are sexual predators, seems like a no brainer to enact a law that requires sex offenders to register with all social networking sites as sexual predators.

I know what your are thinking, you are thinking “what if the sexual predator” makes up a false name? Yes, they could surely do this and it would be hard to enforce. In fact even if the proposed legislation passes, how is it going to be enforced? As stated in the article by the Santa Ana Police Chief Paul Walters “it would be a deterrent for registered sex offenders.” That is true, but include the registration or “no fly social networking list” for sexual predators and change the penalty from a misdemeanor to a felony. For heavens sake, a misdemeanor for stalking a child or young adult to rape or worse kill, quite unbelievable. The enforcement of sexual predators not to violate the original laws of a sexual predator registration (do not go X feet from children, etc) is also difficult to enforce. In fact most laws are only enforced in a reactionary manner. However, the more provisions we can place on sexual predators to prevent them from making more victims from our children the better.

Parents, the best advice I can give you as a former law enforcement officer, now social media strategist is to keep tabs on your kids social networking. Know who they are communicating with, what is on their status update threads (read over their status updates), and ask them where they are going, who with, where did you meet them if it is someone you have not heard them mention before. Social media is changing our world and social networks are filled with criminals who are going to take advantage of opportunities. Mike Vallez

http://www.michaelvallez.com

http://www.crazymikesapps.com

Share

{ 12 comments }

Neither Mashable nor pleaserobme.com are fresh on the scene with the common sense notion that criminals are just now getting active in social networking. Criminals have been using social networking sites as a form of communication in their criminal enterprises as well as a place to cultivate job leads (crime leads for those who did not understand that statement).

We are all adults here and common sense should, should tell you that there are a lot of “creepy” people on the world wide web (even if you can’t see them). Have you ever bothered to turn on the “who’s near me” or “location” function on any social networking app for your iPhone or on the computer? You will be surprised how many people pop up near you when you are online. I have done this in Tampa and thousands of people were near me and online at the same time. I guess because all of these people are on Twitter and Facebook that they are like me (law abiding citizens) and okay, WRONG!

So what, who cares who is near me! Okay, lets do some deductive reasoning. How many burglars work 9 to 5 jobs? answer 0 (valid). How many sex predators have been cured? answer 0 (valid). How many of the people viewing my location preferences could be criminals or seeking to be involved in criminal activity? answer everyone who can view your location or status update (valid). Don’t be lulled into thinking that because you cannot see a criminal that they don’t exist. You can say to yourself that “that will never happen to me,” but ladies don’t put a status update at 2:00am while at a bar and think you are safe. Being a former policeman I can tell you a rapist is looking for a “crime of opportunity” and hanging out in an entertainment district for intoxicated females is a no brainer, let alone “here I am over here” status updates.

The real bother about the pleaserobme.com website is the so called “public service” value this website is lending to the web community. They tout that what they are really doing is a public service, but from a law enforcement perspective their website offers “zero public service” usefulness. Yes, the user updates are on available on Twitter, but to RSS feed catch them into a website and head the feed category “new opportunities” and “recent empty houses” is pretty disgusting. Mashable bought into this websites intent and lauded them, or at least appeared neutral to the websites purpose. Their purpose “The goal of this website is to raise some awareness on this issue and have people think about how they use services like Foursquare, Brightkite, Google Buzz etc. Because all this site is, is a dressed up Twitter search page. Everybody can get this information.” If everybody can get it, then why provide it to the criminal and make their criminal activities easier to research? Why name your website pleaserobme.com, which shows as #2 for “Rob Me” search parameters in Google? I can’t seem to connect the dots on this one.

Eventually a crime is going to occur and the criminal will confess that he used pleaserobme.com to commit a burglary, worse a rape, and worse yet a child’s murder. I guess pleaserobme.com will use a public relations campaign as follows: “this information already exists on the web and we in no way encourage criminal activities by posting peoples status updates on the web. The fact that a criminal used our website to cultivate a victim for a heinous crime is unfortunate.” (lawsuit) As new media unfolds opportunities to exploit others information go unchecked because there is no law designed to deal with these new issues. Personally, I feel the owners of pleaserobme.com are just trying to make a buck and they really don’t care if anyone gets hurt in the process. CM

Share

{ 12 comments }

While attending the Blog World and New Media Expo 2009 I had the privilege of hearing Chris Brogan speak several times throughout the conference. I also had a chance to speak with him for a few seconds, but I took full advantage of those seconds and went right after my niche, Social/New Media and law enforcement. Chris was intrigued with the topic when I spoke with him and through email the following interview transpired:

Mike: Q: Do you think law enforcement agencies should be participating in social media?

Chris: A: Absolutely. People are volunteering up lots of usable data on Facebook, Twitter, blogs, and elsewhere. Law enforcement organizations are doing some great stuff in various areas, including the Twitter presence of the Baltimore PD, and several other projects. The Ten Point Coalition in Boston is using Facebook to see which gang members are still alive, by asking them to keep their status line updated as a way of checking in. There are some great projects going on, and law enforcement’s time to get involved is now.

Mike: Q: Should law enforcement behave any differently in their use of social media compared to regular brands or businesses (not including their specific business model of law enforcement)?

Chris: A:
As transparency is the keyword of using social media, it’s important that law enforcement usage of social media be obvious as to whether the information will be shared in confidence or not. There are places/times when it’s good to have a sympathetic face, and others where you’ve gotta be the voice of the law. Be clear when you’re doing which.

Mike: Q: Without requiring you to turn your crystal ball on, do you think social media is here to stay?

Chris: A: Social media has always been around. The telephone is social media. So are letters. This is just new tools for old methods. The thing is, these tools will be around. I think there will be other changes ahead.

Mike: Q: Do you see any pitfalls in law enforcement agencies using social media?

Chris: A: I think there are always risks. This is a lot of information, kept in textual form, out on the open web. There are ways people can start trying to seek out legal information or surveillance information and the like, but remember that this data is human-entered. If you’re putting out information that can be used against you in some way, that’s a matter of education and not the tools.

Mike: Q: Do you see social media sites like Twitter and Facebook could be used to communicate early warnings say in a 911 format in the future?

Chris: A: I think Twitter’s doing a great job of this. Amber alerts, and lots of other alerts are moving across these tools. They’re one-to-many and they promote group think. Imagine things like school threat systems. Right now, they mass-SMS a bunch of phones. However, if it’s a false alarm, or if the info changes, a system like Twitter is far more dynamic.

Whether it is social media & marketing or social media & law enforcement, Chris Brogan is well versed in social media. He provides some great information for the law enforcement community to think about before getting into social media, but most importantly as Chris says, “law enforcement’s time to get involved is now.”

Share

{ 25 comments }


Play Social Media @Large

Share

{ 0 comments }

Screen shot 2009-10-31 at 1.15.39 PM

A great article from Asiaone Digital called Booked through Facebook? provides a some very insightful vision on how law enforcement agencies can use Facebook as one of their tools. Progressive agencies like the Singapore Police Force (SPF) understand the reach Facebook provides and because of this the SPF use Facebook for several different law enforcement opportunities. They use Facebook for enforcement activities. crime prevention activities, and communication.

The SPF posts pictures of individuals who are wanted for various crimes and an explanation of why those individuals are wanted. They also post crime prevention information as well as other beneficial information for their “fans.” For a message to have impact it has to reach followers, or in Facebook page measurement you need to have ‘fans” following you so they can see your message. Otherwise you message just blows with the wind and no one sees it. To the SPF’s credit they have about 9300 visitors today since their page went live in April of 2009. The SPF get it. They get the fact that social media has benefit as a law enforcement tool. But, social media is not the end all be all, it is merely a “new enforcement tool.”

Why are the SPF and other law enforcement agencies wasting their time playing around with social media? Because there are 330 million people on Facebook and this number goes up everyday. Although, the SPF only have 9300 fans, whatever they post on their fan page can be shared by any one of their followers. Depending on a followers number of followers your message could reach a whole lot of people, for free. Exponential viral communication takes hold and you could potentially have millions of people see the picture and information surrounding a wanted person, crime prevention tips, etc. This concept is not that hard to understand. It is a little discouraging to know that not all law enforcement agencies are using Facebook as a law enforcement tool. The only cost associated with a Facebook fan page is the time it takes to set it up and manage it. Of course this cost is labor and if this is not already being done by someone, it is hard to get started due to time, money, other assigned duties. Especially from a government angle during this period of poor economics there is a loss of tax dollars, there are employee cutbacks, etc. It is going to take a visionary law enforcement executives to implement social media into their communication plan.

What does the devils advocate say? Although, the SPF have been putting up wanted individual pictures they have not made any arrests from this effort. Could it be the way individuals have to communicate the knowledge they have of the wanted people? If they communicate out in public on their Facebook wall then the bad person may be tipped off or worse yet possibly be vindictive towards the would be tipster. The SPF solve this by providing a 1-800 number to report the leads to help capture the wanted person. This is a great conversion tool, taking the online communication to offline action (brilliant). There could also be fake accounts made with false tips provided, but this already happens through phone communication. There are always going to be some drawbacks or “pros” and “cons” in using social media as a law enforcement tool. But, from my perspective the “pros” far outweigh the “cons.”

The use of Facebook as a crime enforcement, crime prevention, and information tool by law enforcement should be mandatory by any government agency (local or federal) that cares about protecting their citizens. A little dramatic, no! Common sense, yes! By the way, law enforcement agencies, Facebook is not the only agency that you can leverage free communication while engaging in social media. MySpace, Twitter, and many others fit your communication models where your citizens are spending large amounts of time each day.

The real reason law enforcement is not using social media is they are uneducated in how to interact with people on Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and others. This is not rocket science either. You talk to them as if they were regular people, it just happens in another forum called social media. Any law enforcement agency that would like more information on how to implement social media into their communication platform feel free to contact met at mike@michaelvallez.com or offline at 352-457-3673.

Share

{ 2 comments }

customerservice

When I started this blog, Mike’s Social Media Blog I wanted one of my first post’s to be on customer service. Well this blog has been a little neglected due to simply being to damn busy. Yes, no excuse, but putting food on the table, being a good employee to my company Altegrity, and fitting in my family (notice they are last) has been to say the least a balancing act. So I have decided to blast my customer service post out today.

Do any of you see it a little ironic that social media is reviving a sense of customer service? The companies/people who are engaging their consumers in social media and actually listening to them are bringing back a sense of customer service. If you have attended college you have heard a rant or two that the Untied States is fast becoming a “service industry” country. But, go to your local Walmart, doctor, government agency and you would all but think customer service is in the crapper. Here are a couple of real life examples of horrible customer service, which I am sure none of you have experienced (sarcasm).

Example#1-The Surgeon-My wife Lisa was having some problems with her hand and it led us to an orthopedic surgeon. Post MRI, x-ray, initial exam we were at our last appointment before surgery. My wife had an issue with one of the front office personnel at this visit before seeing the surgeon. The issue, we showed up early for our appointment and we continuously had others go before us who arrived after us. Typically not a big deal, but after 45 minutes after her scheduled appointment we began to become annoyed. My wife spoke out to a rather cranky front office person, but within 5 minutes we were in a room, problem solved right, wrong. Apparently, the surgeon was informed we were insurrectionists and he had an attitude upon entering our room, 20 minutes later. He treated my wife like an idiot, her questions were dumb and his answers were evasive. Point blank, we asked him a question about the surgery and his answer, “the pain has nothing to do with the surgery.” The why have the surgery? My wife and I left extremely dismayed that the surgeon was so uninformative and cold during this vist. Neither myself or my wife complained once during this visit.

Now, I like you would think, yes my wife or I caused this problem in the first place. Bull crap! A professional, especially a surgeon who takes an oath to treat his patients with sincerity should be able to overcome agitation (if you can call it that) and keep a good bedside manner. Remember, no matter how you slice it the customer is always right.

Example#2-Government agnecies-There seems to be an almost “carte blanche” attitude that because someone works at a service position in a government agency that they can treat you like crap. For 7 years I conducted federal background investigations and had to obtain police records from law enforcement records sections at numerous agencies. Seemed like no matter what day it was, the majority of the time (80%) most of the folks on the front end of these sections were difficult to communicate with and were resistant to doing their job. Bottom line, they appeared to have a high level of disgust for their jobs, at least from my perception. End result, they dish it back to you and I the consumer, a hard time when we go in for service.

I am not trying to be overly sensitive and, yes, I realize people have off days, bad days, yes I get it. But, I was a waiter during college and while in the police academy. My revenue during this time depended primarily on my tips. I did not receive good tips if I provided terrible service. Maybe the people in the above scenarios would provide better service if they truly received compensation from each service experience they provided.

The reality is people are tired of the bull crap and shotty service they get. They are tired of being treated like mushrooms and kept in the dark. They are tired of having products designed and produced with little to no input, then having those products shoved down their throat (car industry). People have had enough and I don’t blame them. If I am going to spend my money with a business that provides great customer service. So why do some in social media get it when it comes to “customer service?”

The basis of social media is to listen, engage, and to provide others with something of value. The irony is the web is the last place you think this positive “customer service” movement would have started. Bloggers to their credit have pushed this issue by blogging about everything. Social media customer service has blossomed from this movement. Yes, movement! There is a cultural change at foot and the change is a sense of inclusion into business models, inclusion of you and I the lowly consumer, end user, people with the money. This movement also includes law enforcement.

Law enforcement agencies like the Boca Raton PD and the Lakeland PD get it. They realize they can offer better law enforcement protection by getting their citizens involved through social media, because that is where a lot of their citizens are getting information. Instead of waiting to see if social media will last more than a couple more years these agencies are aggressively attempting to add this piece of the communication puzzle to their existing communication plans. By doing this they are providing their citizens better customer service. They are offering more, becoming more transparent, listening to their constituents, etc. These law enforcement agencies are providing a level of customer service not often seen in law enforcement (wow what a breath of fresh air).

My customer service goal is to be able to provide my wife, boss, kids, friends, acquaintances, and anyone I have contact with a great experience when dealing with them. Making them feel special, included, and important. People want that extra touch service that makes them feel special.

Share

{ 9 comments }